Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has
denied the accusation linking him with the current crisis tearing at
the heart of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). The factional Chairman
of the opposition party, Senator Ali Modu Sheriff, claimed the quest for
the party’s presidential ticket for the 2019 election was the main
cause of the PDP crisis. He had also alleged that one of the party’s
founding fathers had a hand in it all.
In a recent interview with African
Independent Television (AIT), the embattled chairman accused Governor
Nyesom Wike and former PDP Deputy National Chairman, Prince Uche
Secondus, of plotting to hand over the party’s presidential ticket to a
prominent leader of the All Progressives Congress (APC). “Wike and
Secondus are working to give the party’s ticket in 2019 to a man in APC,
a man that is not even bold enough to leave the APC and join us. He was
in the PDP before. He was a founding father of the PDP,” Sheriff said,
adding, “I don’t have to mention him (his name). Secondus himself told
me that he and Wike always meet this man to strategise on 2019. I told
him that it is wrong; if the man is bold enough, let him come and join
us now”.
Sheriff was apparently referring to
Atiku. And the former vice president knows this that much, which was why
he quickly responded to the allegation. He said he had no hand in the
PDP crisis. Sheriff has not provided any evidence yet to contradict
Atiku’s denial. He did not even tender any evidence to back his
statement beyond his claim that Secondus allegedly told him that he
(Secondus) and Wike had been meeting Atiku to strategise on 2019. While
it may be true that Atiku has no hand in the crisis rocking PDP at
present, it may not be true that Atiku has no eye on 2019 presidential
race, and the former vice president has not said so either. Denying
Sheriff’s allegation, Atiku, in a terse statement on his Twitter handle @
Atiku, merely said:”Former VP @ Atiku has no hand in PDP crisis”.
The former vice president nurses a
burning ambition to occupy the topmost office in the land. He is a
veteran of presidential contests in the country. There is hardly any
race for the nation’s presidency he did n’t enlist in since he first
indicated interest in the job in 1992 on the platform of the defunct
Social Democratic Party (SDP). That year, he ran a tight race with late
business mogul, Bashorun M.K.O. Abiola, for SDP’s ticket, eventually
losing the ticket to Abiola after a second ballot. Atiku’s undying
ambition to be president is widely known. That ambition is believed to
have played a part in the ill-tempered face-off between him and
President Obasanjo, which rocked their administration from the beginning
of Obasanjo’s second term in 2003 till the very end of that regime.
Also, that presidential ambition has
seen Atiku in and out of PDP like Sheriff said. In 2007, he contested
for the presidency on the platform of the defunct Action Congress of
Nigeria (ACN), the party he ran to when President Olusegun Obasanjo
completely annihilated him in PDP and muscled him out of the party, not
without putting up a ferocious resistance though. Four years earlier,
the time many political analysts saw as his biggest opportunity because
Obasanjo’s fabled magnificence was already downhill, Atiku failed to
join the race because he was largely indecisive.
Instead, he accepted to be Obasanjo’s
running mate on PDP platform, even though the strain was already
noticeable in their union. He returned again to PDP in 2011 to contest
for the party’s ticket with a sitting President Goodluck Jonathan. Of
course, he lost woefully. In 2015 and as one of the political
heavyweights that birthed the then-opposition All Progressives Congress,
Atiku again came out to contest for the party’s presidential ticket at a
time the clamour for General Muhammadu Buhari to mount the saddle was
at its zenith. He came a distant third, behind Buhari and former Kano
State Governor Rabiu Musa kwankwanso. Buhari won the ensuing
presidential poll, defeating incumbent President Jonathan.
Now, will Atiku throw his hat into the
ring for the 2019 presidential contest? Big question! Let me first say
that whatever Atiku decides to do in respect of 2019 is his choice. If
he decides to run, he will be exercising his fundamental human right. He
is eminently qualified for the office. He knows his onions. He is
articulate and has wide network of contacts nationally and
internationally. He is clear-headed and has outstanding ideas about what
he wants to do for this country if he emerges president.
His prescription on restructuring as a
panacea for resolving the nation’s political problems, which he unfolded
the other day in Abuja, was profound and insightful. I had argued
elsewhere before that I would prefer leaders like Atiku who over the
years had laboured laboriously, fought courageously to be president and
prepared elaborately for the office to mount the saddle some day as
opposed to some others like Obasanjo, late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua
and Jonathan who had to be goaded into the race and foisted on us when
they did not struggle for the office and appeared ill- prepared for it.
But my sense is though the present
administration is still battling to make the desired impact and the
people are yet to get the ‘change’ they voted for and also we do not
know yet what Buhari will do in respect of 2019 race (whether he will do
a Mandela option), Atiku will be embarking on another wild goose chase
if he ventures into the 2019 presidential race. Buhari’s anti-corruption
crusade, even with its alleged imperfection, is been waged stubbornly
and the president is being applauded at home and abroad for it. That
trend seems irreversible and the crusade may sound the death knell of
those who have corruption baggage in their bid to occupy leadership
positions in future. Atiku is battling the public perception that he is
generally corrupt, which may hunt him in 2019, the same albatross that
may hunt former military president, General Ibrahim Babangida, to his
grave.
• Rahman, former Editor, Thisday on Sunday, is Managing Editor of Western Post. Follow him on Twitter @tunderahmanu
Obasanjo’s Rare Rejoinder
It’s not usually in the character of former President Obasanjo to say something and turn round to deny it. He would say something and would stand by what he said. So when the former president denied the statement credited to him in the media that three or four of them from different parts of the country got together and brought General Muhammadu Buhari to power in 2015 (perhaps the same way three or four Northerners brought him (Obasanjo) to power in 1999 from prison), I verily believed him. But the statement credited to him is also believable. Obasanjo was reported to have made the statement at a reception organised for him in Jalingo, Taraba State capital where he went on a visit. He has, however, issued a denial, saying nobody can claim glory for Buhari’s election. The problem, as I indicated earlier, is the statement credited to him is believable. It is in synch with the former president’s character to revel in incredulous vain-glory, in moral righteousness.
It’s not usually in the character of former President Obasanjo to say something and turn round to deny it. He would say something and would stand by what he said. So when the former president denied the statement credited to him in the media that three or four of them from different parts of the country got together and brought General Muhammadu Buhari to power in 2015 (perhaps the same way three or four Northerners brought him (Obasanjo) to power in 1999 from prison), I verily believed him. But the statement credited to him is also believable. Obasanjo was reported to have made the statement at a reception organised for him in Jalingo, Taraba State capital where he went on a visit. He has, however, issued a denial, saying nobody can claim glory for Buhari’s election. The problem, as I indicated earlier, is the statement credited to him is believable. It is in synch with the former president’s character to revel in incredulous vain-glory, in moral righteousness.
He likes to see himself as that super
being that knows all the nation’s problems and the solutions to them.
The sad thing, however, is when he was catapulted to power again in
1999, 20 years after he voluntarily handed over power to a civilian as a
military leader, it was n’t a jolly ride to Eldorado for the country as
many had expected. Obasanjo tried his best but through some
self-conceited decisions and actions, which again was a throw-back to
his persona; his era turned out not exactly a glorious one. It’s all
well and good that Obasanjo acknowledged that Buhari was brought to
power by the collective will of the people, not by any single person or
group. A majority of Nigerians voted for Buhari because they were
yearning for ‘change’ from the clueless government of President Goodluck
Jonathan. More than one year after that historic vote, have the people
gotten the ‘change’ they happily voted for? Big question!
0 comments:
Post a Comment