• Warns that current structure leads to nowhere
Former
Secretary General of the Commonwealth of Nations, Chief Emeka Anyaoku,
yesterday said Nigeria was failing and warned that the country’s federal
structure as currently composed would not help Nigeria to attain
nationhood.
The
former diplomat, therefore, joined many other Nigerians clamouring for
the restructuring of the country along a more flexible fiscal federal
state that would replace the present federal structure, which retains
more power and resources at the centre.
Speaking
in Abuja during the launch of a book, ‘Nigeria: The Forsaken Road to
Nationhood and Development’ by Ambassador Humphrey Orjiakor, he argued
that for Nigeria to develop and stay united, the country must be
restructured.
Anyaoku
said because of the dominance of the centre over the constituent
states, the country was fast failing to meet the expectations of its
founding fathers and admonished those opposed to restructuring to have a
rethink.
He
said: “I think that the Nigeria we have with 36 federating units now is
not working. The country continues to under-perform because of the 36
states we have now. No less than 27 of them can no longer pay the
salaries of their workers.
“The
planning of economic development is less efficient on the basis of
these non-viable states. If we had six federating units, you would have
more viable basis for planning economic development and those who fear
that it would mean disintegration of the country are wrong, because the
country was doing a lot better at the time of its independence.”
Reminding
his audience that the country did better when it was governed along
four regions, Anyaoku argued that the current structure, which was
initiated by the military from 1966 was defective.
“What
we are doing now will lead us nowhere in terms of development, and in
terms of building nationhood to which Nigerians will be proud of to
belong,” he said.
On
the opposition against restructuring, Anyaoku said: “We are failing and
that is the only argument to present to those who are opposed to
restructuring. I think we need to persuade those with hardening
positions against restructuring because this country is living in denial
of the basic facts of its under-performance.”
He
explained that the over-centralisation of power at the centre following
the intervention of the military in politics led the country to its
present woes.
According
to him, “The centre was not that powerful, we have the example of the
then leader of the biggest political party in the country, the Northern
Peoples Congress (NPC), Sir Ahmadu Bello, who chose to remain as the
Premier of the North and sent his lieutenant to be the prime minister of
the federation. That was the reflection of the bonds of power and
influence between the centre and the region.
“And
the Western Region, the Northern Region, Eastern Region and the
Mid-Western Region of the country were developing faster than the states
created since the military intervened in governance.”
Former
Minister of External Affairs and Under Secretary of the United Nations,
Prof. Ibrahim Gambari, who was one of the discussants at the occasion,
praised the author of the book for his contribution to knowledge, noting
that the publication was timely, coming at a time the nation was facing
one of its most difficult challenges.
Saying
the author blamed the country’s poor performance on ethnicity, greed
and corruption, but explaining that those were the effects rather than
the causes of the challenges of nation building. Gambari said Orjiakor’s
position still provided food for thought “for Nigeria’s overly
exuberant antipodeans”.
The
author, Orjiakor, explained that the book was about the need to
restructure the country. “My thesis is that if we do not restructure, we
could muddle along for another 20 or 50 years. We have been running
round and round in a circle,” he said.
He
argued: “We have to redesign the structure of our country, make it
stronger and then it will take off. It’s not all the answers, Nigeria’s
problem is not restructuring but it is the fundamental basis for change.
“As
a matter of fact, it’s only a challenge, it’s not a problem because
when you have a challenge, you tackle it by going to the source to give
them the information they need. Many people are either deliberately or
ignorantly misunderstanding the concept of restructuring.
“Restructuring
in no way suggests dismembering the country, no. As a matter of fact,
it means the opposite, it means strengthening our unity and mutual
understanding and giving people the opportunity to pursue their own
lives with everything God has given them as talents.
“What
we are doing now is suppressing both individual and collective talents
by exposing everybody to wait for federal government to bring bread and
butter at the end of every month.
“How
long is that going to work, especially now that the oil revenue, the
oil rent we were all depending on is beginning to deplete? How long can
we continue to feed ourselves from one centre? That is what the quest
is. So, if we bring the message home to the electorate in every part of
this country, I promise you a majority of Nigerians will begin to
clamour for restructuring.”
0 comments:
Post a Comment