• Turf war between AGF and Communications Ministry/NCC simmers
MTN’S PROPOSED N300BN PAYMENT PLAN
• N50bn already paid in “good faith”
• N100bn via electronic transfer between Dec 31, 2016 and Dec 31, 2020
• N80bn investment in Nigerian sovereign debt instruments in 2016-2017
• N70bn through the provision of broadband access to the FG (subject to excess capacity on MTN’s fibre network) for its e-initiatives
• N50bn already paid in “good faith”
• N100bn via electronic transfer between Dec 31, 2016 and Dec 31, 2020
• N80bn investment in Nigerian sovereign debt instruments in 2016-2017
• N70bn through the provision of broadband access to the FG (subject to excess capacity on MTN’s fibre network) for its e-initiatives
The Senate Committee on Communications yesterday revealed that MTN Communications Nigeria Limited has proposed to pay N300 billion ($1.5 billion) in the ongoing negotiations between the company and Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN), on the N780 billion fine imposed on the network operator by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC).
The industry regulator imposed a N1.04
trillion fine on MTN last October for failing to disconnect 5.2 million
unregistered subscribers on its network, but later reduced it to N780
billion and gave the network provider till December 31, 2015 to pay up
after it had appealed for leniency.
But before the deadline, MTN sued the
federal government challenging the power of the federal government and
NCC to impose the fine.
Last month, it withdrew the case and paid N50 billion as a gesture of good faith towards the settlement of the fine.
The penitence exhibited by MTN paved the
way for negotiations with the federal government led by Malami and the
South African-owned firm led by former US Attorney General, Mr. Eric
Holder.
At an investigative hearing held yesterday
by the Senate committee in the National Assembly, vice chairman of the
committee, Senator Adeola Olamilekan (Lagos West) brandished a proposal
acknowledged by the Solicitor General of the Federation, Taiwo Abiodun,
from MTN wherein the network provider insisted that it could only pay
N300 billion.
A breakdown of the proposal which was
forwarded to the Ministers of Communications and Finance by the
solicitor general as well as NCC executive vice chairman, Prof. Umar
Dambatta include the N50 billion already paid by MTN into a recovery
account of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and another N100 billion to
be paid via electronic transfer between December 31, 2016 and December
31, 2020.
The proposal also includes another N80
billion proposed payment by MTN as a demonstration of its commitment to
and confidence in the Nigerian economy and will be subject to necessary
regulatory approvals,
This would come by way of MTN Nigeria
committing to purchase N80 billion of Nigerian sovereign debt issued on
the international market in 2016-2017.
The last tranche of N70 billion which the
network provider proposed will be through the provision of broadband
access to the Federal Government of Nigeria (subject to excess capacity
on the company’s fibre network) for the purpose of the government’s
e-initiatives (e.g. visa processing, public service, connecting schools,
registration, etc.).
If accepted, the broadband access valued at
N70 billion will commence from the date of the execution of the
agreement between the federal government and MTN to December 31, 2020.
Olamilekan, having brandished the document,
accused the AGF of deceiving Nigerians that negotiations were still
ongoing with MTN, whereas he had already executed an agreement with MTN
that will allow the company pay the proposed N300 billion in four years.
However, an official from the AGF’s office
dismissed the charge, describing the document as a proposal which he
said was not an end in itself but a means to an end.
But Olamilekan disagreed, insisting that the government was only playing on Nigeria’s intelligence and questioned the rationale behind the acceptance of N50 billion from MTN, which was the first tranche of the payment as contained in the proposal, and yet claiming that negotiations were still ongoing.
But Olamilekan disagreed, insisting that the government was only playing on Nigeria’s intelligence and questioned the rationale behind the acceptance of N50 billion from MTN, which was the first tranche of the payment as contained in the proposal, and yet claiming that negotiations were still ongoing.
The session was attended by Minister of
Communications, Mr. Adebayo Shittu, Dambatta, another representative of
the AGF, Mr. Dayo Apata, MTN’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Ferdinand
Moolman, acting Director of Banking and Payment System Department of the
CBN, and the Accountant General of the Federation, Mr. Ahmed Idris.
The meeting revealed how the AGF and presidency kept NCC and Shittu in the dark in the negotiations with MTN on the fine.
While Shittu said he was not part of the
entire negotiation process, Dambatta said NCC was not responsible for
the reduction of the fine from N1.04 trillion to N780 billion, saying it
was only invited to a meeting of an inter-agency committee set up by
President Muhammadu Buhari.
He said the committee reduced the fine by
25 per cent following the president’s approval after MTN wrote a letter
of apology to the government.
Both Shittu and Dambatta said they were not aware of negotiations between Malami and MTN that led to the payment of N50 billion by the latter into the CBN recovery account on February 24.
Both Shittu and Dambatta said they were not aware of negotiations between Malami and MTN that led to the payment of N50 billion by the latter into the CBN recovery account on February 24.
Shittu maintained that the matter was
between Malami and MTN. According to him, since the matter went to
court, his ministry and the NCC had virtually been kept at arms length
on the matter, adding that when MTN indicated its decision to settle the
matter out-of-court, the AGF gave it two conditions for the
out-of-court-settlement.
He listed the conditions to include making a
down payment of six per cent of the total fine, amounting to N50
billion first, and withdrawal of the suit, both conditions which he said
MTN fulfilled.
In his submission, Dambatta disclosed that
the fine of N1.04 trillion imposed on MTN by NCC was predicated on a
charge of N200 per line that was not registered by the company, in line
with its directive at the time.
However, he said the negotiations on the
N1.04 trillion fine down to N780 billion was handled by an inter-agency
committee set up by the president to look into the fine, to which he
said NCC was invited.
According to him, based on a letter of
apology written by MTN and its remission, Buhari gave approval to the
committee to reduce the fine by N25 per cent, thus bringing it down to
N780 billion.
He further disclosed that NCC was not
informed about the move to settle the case out of court neither, nor was
it a party to the payment of N50 billion to CBN.
On its part, MTN explained that the process leading to the payment of N50 billion began when it made its intention to settle out-of-court known to the AGF.
On its part, MTN explained that the process leading to the payment of N50 billion began when it made its intention to settle out-of-court known to the AGF.
According to MTN’s chief executive, who
echoed the communications minister’s submission, the AGF had informed
them that the federal government’s interest in the matter would be
dependent on MTN’s preparedness to fulfill the two conditions enumerated
by AGF, which he said MTN fulfilled.
But the representative of the AGF who said
Malami was unavoidably absent due to a trip out of the country, said on
January 22 while in court, MTN had indicated its interest in settling
the matter out of court and after being told to do so in “good faith”,
by meeting the two conditions, it requested for a long adjournment,
which he said was granted by the court.
He said it was these actions that led to the adjournment of the case to March 18 by the court.
When asked why MTN was asked to pay the money into a CBN account and not the NCC account, Apata said he did not know.
However, the accountant general said though
his office was not involved in the negotiations, he only got involved
in the matter when the AGF asked him to facilitate the opening of an
asset recovery account with the CBN. He said the account was credited
with N50 billion on February 24.
When the committee questioned the AGF’s
representative on the legality of the account, he said he was not in a
position to say whether it was legal or not.
Through out the questioning the Senate
committee did not conceal its displeasure with the entire process, with
Olamilekan demanding to know the right of the AGF to enter into
negotiations with MTN while sidetracking other major stakeholders –
Ministry of Communications and NCC – in the matter.
He accused the AGF and accountant general
of having ulterior motives in the matter by taking over the jobs of NCC
and Ministry of Communications.
Also speaking, Senator Abiodun Olujinmi
(Ekiti South), said impunity usually begins with the abuse of a process,
saying having served on the board of NCC, imposition of fines on
telecommunications company by NCC was a regular norm.
According to her, such fines are usually paid into the NCC account, for subsequent transfer by NCC into the Federation Account.
According to her, Malami and Idris had shaved the heads of Shittu and NCC in their presence by totally taking over their jobs.
She described the entire negotiation
process as “voodoo” and faulted the opening of a recovery account for
money that was not stolen, describing it as a clandestine move to
circumvent due process.
She also queried the rationale behind the determination of 6 per cent of the fine, amounting to N50 billion paid by MTN.
“You asked them to pay 6 per cent of N780
billion. And you said it was in good faith. Who determined that? You
asked them to withdraw the case from court and you said the case is
still in court,” she said.
Another member of the committee, Senator
Isa Misau (Bauchi Central) did not mince words in accusing the attorney
general, CBN and accountant general of a criminal conspiracy with MTN.
But they disagreed with the senator, saying
their action had nothing to do with a conspiracy of any kind with MTN
against their country.
Nevertheless, the committee chairman,
Gilbert Nnaji, said since the AGF who is the principal player in the
matter was not available to answer pertinent questions, the meeting
would be adjourned indefinitely.
He also asked the accountant general and the AGF to go back and review their actions and carry the ministry and NCC along.
However, the outcome and remarks made
during the meeting of the Senate Committee reflected a similar outcome
at a meeting of the House Committee on Communications on Wednesday
during which the committee in the lower chamber insisted that MTN must
pay the entire N1.04 trillion penalty, instead of the reduced fine of
N780 billion.
Both meetings further exposed the simmering
turf war between the Office of the AGF, on one side, and the
Communications Ministry and NCC, on the other side, over negotiations on
the MTN fine.
It is believed that the Communications
Ministry and NCC went crying to the National Assembly with information
on the negotiations in order to project the AGF in a bad light.
Speaking on the issue yesterday, an
industry analyst added that the ministry and NCC were also not happy
that a fund recovery account with the CBN was immediately set up by the
accountant general on the directive of the AGF, meaning that whatever
funds are paid into the account will be out of their reach.
However, he expressed displeasure over the
payment terms on the N300 billion proposed by MTN as full and final
settlement of the fine, saying that whilst the amount could be
considered reasonable, the payment terms were unacceptable,
condescending and should be rejected by the federal government.
“What we expect to see are proper cash
injections staggered over a reasonable period, not an offer of broadband
access of N70 million that will be subject to excess capacity on the
MTN network,” he said.
0 comments:
Post a Comment