- AMCON, businessman to explore amicable settlement
Justice Abdulazeez Anka of the Federal
High Court in Lagos yesterday vacated the interim order granted to the
Assets Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) to take over some
assets belonging to businessman, Mr. Jimoh Ibrahim, over his alleged
indebtedness to the corporation.
The judge set aside the ex-parte order
following an application by AMCON’s lawyer, Mr. Yusuf Ali (SAN) that the
parties in the suit had decided to explore an amicable settlement of
the dispute.
Justice Saliu Saidu had on June 14,
2016, granted AMCON an interim injunction against NICON Investment
Limited, Global Fleet Oil & Gas Limited and Ibrahim.
But NICON Insurance Limited, Nigeria
Re-Insurance Hotels Limited, Abuja International Hotels Limited and
NICON Hotels Limited had in a motion on notice filed by their lawyers
led by Chief Niyi Akintola (SAN) and Chief Bolaji Ayorinde (SAN) prayed
the court to set aside the ex-parte order on the grounds that AMCON
deliberately failed to make full disclosure of all the material facts
before the court.
At the resumed hearing of the
applications to vacate the ex parte order yesterday, AMCON’s lawyer told
the court that since the provisions of the Federal High Court rules
encourage amicable settlement of disputes, the parties had decided to
meet and report back to court within two weeks.
“In the spirit of good faith to show
that we are doing this to promote equity and justice, we have agreed
that the ex-parte order should be suspended so that parties can explore
the issue of settlement.
“We have an agreement that each of the
parties will nominate one chartered accountant each that will carry out a
forensic audit of the account.
“Since Union Bank is the principal bank
that gave out the loan, the accountants will meet at Union Bank’s
headquarters and they are to report back within two weeks,” Ali said.
Confirming the agreement, Akintola,
Ayorinde and Ibrahim who led a team of lawyers, urged the court to set
aside the ex parte order so as to give the parties unfettered access to
meet and report back to the court.
Addressing the court, Akintola submitted
that the parties had agreed to explore an amicable way of settling the
dispute, adding that the applicants had appointed the firm of Adewale
Folowosele & Associates to meet with those that would be nominated
by AMCON and Union Bank.
“We have appointed Adewale Folowosele
& Associates and await that of AMCON and Union Bank, respectively.
Consequently, I apply that the ex parte order of June 14, 2016 should be
discharged and parties will return back to court within two weeks,”
Akintola said.
Ali told the court that as soon as the
names of the accountants nominated my AMCON and the bank are ready,
their names would be forwarded to the applicants.
In a short ruling, Justice Anka discharged the order and adjourned the matter till August 1, 2016.
Earlier, Akintola and Ayorinde, in their
applications, had told the court that the properties attached by the
interim order belong to the applicants who were not parties to the suit
filed by AMCON, thereby making it illegal, unlawful and contrary to the
provisions of Section 28 of the NICON Insurance Corporation of Nigeria
Act, Cap N54 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.
Ayorinde submitted that the applicants
were not borrowers or beneficiaries nor were they guarantors to the debt
owed the plaintiff (AMCON).
He further argued that AMCON failed to
neither comply with the condition precedent by serving a pre-action
notice on the applicants, nor did the plaintiff seek the leave of the
court before joining the applicants to the main suit in their writ of
summons purportedly filed on June 27, 2016.
“We submit that a court is only
competent when a case comes before it by due process of law and upon
fulfillment of any condition precedent to the exercise of jurisdiction.
“Any defect on the competence of the court is fatal to the proceedings before the court and renders it a nullity.
“We also submit that the only condition
under which the court can entertain the application of a person who is
not a party to the suit is when the party has first sought for and
obtained the leave of the court before bringing the action,” Ayorinde
argued.
The applicants had in a 24-pragraph
affidavit in support of the motion on notice deposed to by one Gbenga
Onilude, a litigation officer in the law firm of B. Ayorinde & Co
stated that none of the properties attached in the ex parte order
belongs to any of the defendants: NICON Investment Limited, Global Fleet
Oil and Gas Limited and Ibrahim.
According to the deponent, the ex parte
order was obtained via suppression and misrepresentation of the material
facts by the plaintiff (AMCON) and it was obtained in bad faith against
persons who were not parties to the suit.
0 comments:
Post a Comment