Ijeoma Nwogwugwu,
editor of ThisDay reveals the untold story about the downfall of Skye
Bank and why the Central Bank of Nigeria took over the bank last week,
sacking its board and management.
Last week,
the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) confirmed our worst fears when it
stepped in and sacked the board of directors of Skye Bank Plc, a tier 2
bank, but systemically important enough to cause a contagion on the rest
of the banking system in the event of failure.
The central bank’s action
was not unexpected. Several market analysts had suspected since the
last quarter of 2015 that the bank was reeling from the burden of
non-performing loans, liquidity and capital adequacy ratios that had
fallen below regulatory requirements, and a weakening of the
macroeconomic environment. The foreboding was further heightened when
Skye Bank, among four other banks, issued a profit warning that the
market noted.
In rationalising the removal of the
bank’s chairman, managing director, other non-executive and some of its
older executive directors, the CBN governor, Godwin Emefiele, said the
intervention had become unavoidable in view of the persistent failure of
Skye Bank to meet minimum thresholds for critical prudential and
adequacy ratios, which culminated in the bank’s permanent presence at
the CBN’s lending window. In particular, he said, Skye Bank’s liquidity
and non-performing loan ratios had been below and above the required
thresholds respectively for quite a while. He was silent, nonetheless,
on what the central bank’s examination report of the bank had unearthed.
Emefiele was also unwilling to divulge Skye Bank’s financial results
for full year 2015, in order to forestall a further deterioration of the
bank.
Integrated Energy Distribution and
Marketing Company Limited, a firm fronted by Ayeni, his longtime
partner, Capt. Osa Okunbor, and former military head of state, Gen.
Abudulsalami Abubakar, had acquired the Yola and Ibadan Discos for $228
million in 2013 under the privatisation programme. A year later,
Integrated Energy returned Yola Disco to the Nigerian government on the
grounds that it was impossible to operate and access the assets of the
electricity distribution firm in the North-east due to the Boko Haram
insurgency. After a joint evaluation of the electricity asset, as
provided under the terms of the share purchase agreement, the BPE, in
the twilight of the Jonathan administration, had approved $186 million
as the sum to be refunded to Integrated Energy. But as this article is
being written, nothing has been refunded to the company and its
shareholders, even as the penalties and interest on their Skye Bank loan
continue to mount. Of course, Ibadan Disco, which was retained by
Integrated Energy, is in no better shape, as almost all the loans
extended to investors during the privatisation process have gone bad.
Ayeni and his financial misadventures
aside, the bigger setback for Skye Bank stemmed from its exorbitant
acquisition of Mainstreet Bank. Information provided by officials of
AMCON that was responsible for the Mainstreet Bank sale, showed that the
valuation of the bank was put at N75 billion, implying that no sensible
prospective investor that had undertaken a proper due diligence of
Mainstreet Bank should have offered to pay anything in excess of N80
billion to N100 billion for the bank.
Yet, Skye Bank, which had embarked on an
aggressive growth strategy to catapult itself into a Tier 1 bank,
offered N126 billion for Mainstreet Bank. This was to become Skye Bank’s
undoing. The snag was that Skye Bank did not have the balance sheet to
support the acquisition of a much bigger bank. Not a few market analysts
watched with keen interest and wondered where and how its management
was going to raise the N126 billion for Mainstreet. It has now come to
light that Skye Bank’s management used its deposits to pay for
Mainstreet, effectively putting depositors’ funds at great risk.
The bigger worry for the banking sector
was that this was an inexcusable gamble that escaped the scrutiny and
regulatory oversight of the CBN and the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), both of which did not appear to have done any capital
verification on the sources of funds brought in by Skye Bank for the
Mainstreet acquisition before approving the transaction. Had the CBN, in
particular, performed its regulatory role diligently, it is most likely
Skye Bank would have remained a safe and sound bank.
Skye Bank’s situation became more
precarious when it was penalised alongside FirstBank Nigeria Limited and
United Bank for Africa Plc for failing to remit federal government
funds to the Treasury Single Account (TSA) late last year. While UBA and
FirstBank had robust balance sheets to absorb the penalties running
into billions of naira imposed by the central bank, the N4 billion Skye
Bank was forced to cough up, hurt it to no end.
Another cause for concern was that the
CBN under Emefiele’s watch failed to take responsibility for the lax and
weak regulatory oversight of the bank. Nor did the CBN give a second
thought to other measures that could have been explored along with its
intervention to shield Skye Bank from a run by its depositors and the
ripple effect that this could have on other banks as has been evident in
the last one week. Today, it is not just Skye Bank’s shares that have
been punished by the market, but also the shares of its peers in the
Banking Sector Index of the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE).
More than anyone else, Emefiele should
have known that it would be a tall order for the new board and
management of Skye Bank to raise the badly needed capital for Skye Bank
in a contracting economy. Nigerian banks today are barely lending and
struggling to stay afloat; most are just comfortable with investing in
treasury bills and have become risk averse. Add to this their exposure
to power and oil and gas sector loans, as well as the devaluation of the
naira, all factors certain to depress the performance of Nigerian banks
this year.
Under the circumstances, the best option
for Skye Bank would have been for the CBN to invite AMCON to
recapitalise it and given the new team two to three years to repay the
loan at a premium. This was done with Wema and Unity Banks, and turned
out to be the right stopgap measure that saved both banks from failure.
Wema, for instance, has repaid the N20 billion injected into it by AMCON
at a 14 per cent premium. Unity Bank, on the other hand, is a story
that will be revisited by this writer at a future date.
The point being made is that the CBN
needs to sidestep the political pressure that is brought to bear from
outside, especially from the Presidential Villa, and take its
independence and regulatory role more seriously. Its governor, Emefiele,
saw all the warning signs and only acted just before the lights went
out at Skye Bank. Although he could argue that Skye Bank had emerged as
the highest bidder during the tender for Mainstreet Bank, he still had a
fiduciary duty to safeguard the bank and the entire banking system from
an over-exuberant transaction that was flawed from the outset. Long and
short, he should not have approved the acquisition, period!
Curiously, even the new appointments for
Skye Bank were laced with political considerations. Its new managing
director, Mr. Tokunbo Abiru, was allegedly chosen for the bank by a
national leader of the All Progressive Congress (APC), Bola Ahmed
Tinubu, who still has some interest in Skye Bank as a carryover from his
investment in the defunct Bond Bank (Prudent Bank, Eco Bank, Bond Bank,
Co-operative Bank Plc and Reliance Bank merged in 2006 to form Skye
Bank). In the same vein, the names of two new directors were allegedly
sent from the Villa in Abuja for Emefiele to announce. It is only hoped
that the new team can shake off the political baggage and manage the
bank as the true professionals that they are with enviable track records
in the banking sector.
Skye Bank has become a cautionary tale
that should serve as a lesson to shareholder/directors of banks and the
system regulators. It is beholden on the directors and managers of banks
to exercise due care in the management of depositors’ funds. They are
not funds to be frittered away, or to be trifled with, as they do not
belong to the banks or their shareholders. It is equally beholden on the
regulators to be firm, step up to the plate and never allow infractions
to fester.
Ijeoma Nwogwugwu is the editor of ThisDay Newspapers, where this article was first published. She can be reached via email on HERE.
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author.
0 comments:
Post a Comment