Their decision is based on their conclusion that the court seems to target only African countries.
According
to Reuters (quoting an anonymous AU official), their support for the
withdrawal however came with an unspecified reservation.
“The
leaders of AU member states endorsed the strategy of collective
withdrawal, with reservations,” the AU official, who asked not be
identified, told Reuters.
Details
of the reservation were not given but the summit of heads of states
highlighted that the ICC unfairly targets African nations.
According to a document, the AU summit had proposed a co-ordinated withdrawal unless the ICC was reformed.It also called for Part of the reforms it expected to see in the ICC was “regionalization” of international law, a reference to proposals for an African war crimes court.
Almost a third of the ICC’s 124 members are African, and a withdrawal by a large number of them would cripple a court that has yet to fulfil hopes that it would ensure perpetrators of war crimes and genocide never go unpunished.
Three African states – South Africa, Gambia and Burundi – signaled last year their intention to quit what is the world’s first permanent global war crimes court.
The ICC, which is 15 years old this year, has only ever charged Africans, including the presidents of Kenya and Sudan, although it has procedures open at earlier stages dealing with crimes in Eastern Europe, the Middle East and South America.
Read more
0 comments:
Post a Comment