The recent case of a traditional priest in Ghana who was fatally wounded in the process of testing his supposed anti-bullet charms
has once again illustrated the dangers of superstition in Africa. This
incident has amply shown the imperative of skeptical thinking and
scientific outlook in the region, and the fact that a dearth of critical
temper could damage and shorten the lives of people.
Nana Tolofasito, the traditional priest,
claimed to have spiritual powers and went ahead to test these powers.
He asked somebody to shoot him with a gun in order to demonstrate the
efficacy of his anti-bullet medicine. He sustained serious injuries from
the gunshot because his so-called medicine could not protect him.
Fortunately, the bullet only pierced
through the upper part of the left arm and left a gaping hole. This
indicated that there was no shred of anti-bullet power in his charm. The
supposed medicine could not stop, counter or reduce the ravaging impact
of the bullet.
The graphic photo of Nana Tolofasito
receiving treatment while some blood was gushing out of his body at a
clinic in Ghana should serve as a lesson in the wages of superstition.
It should be a gruesome reminder of the destructive power of such
irrational and paranormal claims. But the question is: Will this
incident ever persuade people across Africa, both the educated and the
non-educated alike, from believing in anti-bullet charms? Will it stop
people in Ghana and in other West African countries from taking
seriously this absurd and dangerous claim that some charm could
neutralize gunshots? I do not think so. And this is the reason why I
said that.
Look, this is not the first time that the process of testing anti-bullet medicine has led to tragic results. Sadly
many of these cases of death or injuries go largely unreported. This is
not the first time that a test had shown the claim of an ‘African’
bullet proof to be baseless. In Nigeria, there have been several of such
instances where traditional medicine men or some potential buyers and
actual users of anti bullets charms had died in the process of testing the ‘medicine’.
Still, the belief in ‘African’ bullet
proof remains pervasive and people continue to use and market
anti-bullet charms. These charms come in various forms and shapes. They
could be in the form of a ring that a person can put on the finger or in
the pocket or on the waist. The anti-bullet medicine could be in form
of liquid which people would drink or rub on their bodies.
However, there is no shred of evidence at all that any of these formations of ‘African bullet proof’ is effective.
That notwithstanding, traditional
priests such as Nana Tolofasito continue to risk their lives to
demonstrate the purported efficacy of these charms. Anti-bullet medicine
remains a silent killer of Africans.
What is most worrisome is that some
African intellectuals continue to promote and defend claims of African
anti bullets charms. They argue that these charms are demonstrations of
‘African science’ despite several tragic cases where these claims had
been proven to be demonstrably false.
The unfortunate thing is that, even when
anti-bullet charms are shown to be evidently false, some people remain
adamant and unconvinced. They still hold on to their belief. These
people rather argue that in this case Nana Tolofasito did not use the
genuine or potent brand of the charm. This pattern of thinking sustains
the irrational belief trend and makes it difficult to eradicate
superstition.
So there is an urgent need to promote
critical evaluation of paranormal claims in Africa. Efforts are needed
to dispel this erroneous impression that African science stands for
superstition and irrationalism. In fact this idea of African science
exoticizes Africa because it makes it seem as if the term, science,
means something different to Africans and therefore should be abandoned.
The standards of science in Africa, what is regarded as science or
scientific in Africa, should not be different from what applies in other
parts of the world.
A process of enlightenment is required
to dissuade other Africans from endangering their lives or the lives of
others by producing or agreeing to test and market anti-bullet charms.
The claim of anti-bullet charms and amulets has no basis in reason,
science or in reality.
Leo Igwe is a human rights activist
and the founder of the Nigerian Humanist Movement. He was the Western
and Southern African representative to IHEU, the International Humanist
and Ethical Union. He can be reached by email HERE.
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author.
0 comments:
Post a Comment