WASHINGTON — President Trump on Tuesday ordered an end to the Obama-era executive action that shields young undocumented immigrants from deportation, calling the program an “amnesty-first approach” and urging Congress to replace it with legislation before it begins phasing out on March 5, 2018.
“I
do not favor punishing children, most of whom are now adults, for the
actions of their parents,” Mr. Trump said in a written statement. “But
we must also recognize that we are nation of opportunity because we are a
nation of laws.”
The
statement was released shortly after Mr. Trump, who had called the
issue a personal dilemma, dispatched his attorney general to announce
that the government will no longer accept new applications from
undocumented immigrants to shield them from deportation under the
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA.
Administration
officials said the roughly 800,000 current beneficiaries of the program
— brought to the United States illegally as children — will not be
immediately affected by what they called an “orderly wind down” of
former President Barack Obama’s policy.
“Only
by the reliable enforcement of immigration law can we produce safe
communities, a robust middle class, and economic fairness for all
Americans,” Mr. Trump said, calling the DACA program an “amnesty-first
approach.”
“Before
we ask what is fair to illegal immigrants, we must also ask what is
fair to American families, students, taxpayers, and jobseekers,” the
president added.
Earlier
on Tuesday, it was Attorney General Jeff Sessions, an immigration
hard-liner who has helped shape Mr. Trump’s views, who publicly announced the move, in essence shifting responsibility for the immigration issue to lawmakers.
“The
program known as DACA that was effectuated under the Obama
administration is being rescinded,” Mr. Sessions told reporters, adding
that “The policy was implemented unilaterally, to great controversy and
legal concern.”
Mr.
Sessions called the Obama-era policy an “open-ended circumvention of
immigration laws” and an unconstitutional use of executive authority.
“The executive branch through DACA deliberately sought to achieve what
the legislative branch specifically refused to authorize on multiple
occasions,” he said.
He
also used the aggrieved language of anti-immigrant activists who argue
that undocumented people are lawbreakers who hurt native-born Americans
by usurping their jobs and pushing down wages.
“The
effect of this unilateral executive amnesty, among other things,
contributed to a surge of minors at the southern border with
humanitarian consequences,” Mr. Sessions said. “It denied jobs to
hundreds of thousands of Americans by allowing those same illegal aliens
to take those jobs.”
Elaine
Duke, the acting Homeland Security secretary, said in a statement that
Mr. Trump chose to “wind the program down in an orderly fashion that
protects beneficiaries in the near-term while working with Congress to
pass legislation.”
The
announcement was an effort by Mr. Trump to honor his campaign pledge to
end Mr. Obama’s immigration policy, while avoiding an immediate
termination of protections and work permits for the so-called
“dreamers,” many of whom have lived in the United States since they were
small children.
“We
are people of compassion, and we are people of law, but there is
nothing compassionate about the failure to enforce immigration law,” Mr.
Sessions said.
Referring
to Mr. Trump’s campaign promise to immediately terminate DACA, Mr.
Sessions said Tuesday’s action was what “the president promised to do,”
adding that Mr. Trump “has delivered to the American people.”
The announcement formally started the clock on revoking legal status from those protected under the five-year-old program.
Mr.
Obama created the DACA program as a way of protecting young,
undocumented immigrants from deportation after Republicans in Congress
repeatedly blocked passage of a legislation to accomplish that goal. The
policy allowed about 800,000 young adults who were brought to the
United States illegally as children to work legally in the United States
and remain in the country without the fear of immediate deportation.
Officials
said some of the current immigrants already receiving protection under
the Obama-era plan will be able to renew their two-year period of legal
status until October 5. But the announcement means that if Congress
fails to act, undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United
States as children could face deportation as early as March to countries
where many of them have never lived.
“Congress
now has the opportunity to advance responsible immigration reform that
puts American jobs and American security first,” Mr. Trump said in his
statement, calling for the enactment of legislation that would slash
legal immigration levels by prioritizing the admittance of people who
speak English and have advanced skills.
The
president said he wanted to “resolve the DACA issue with heart and
compassion – but through the lawful democratic process – while at the
same time ensuring that any immigration reform we adopt provides
enduring benefits for the American citizens we were elected to serve. We
must also have heart and compassion for unemployed, struggling, and
forgotten Americans.”
Immigration
officials said that they do not intend to actively target the young
immigrants as priorities for deportation, though without the program’s
protection, the immigrants are considered subject to removal from the
United States and would no longer be able to work legally.
Homeland
Security officials said no specific guidance would be issued to agents
to shield the young undocumented immigrants from deportation. It would
be up to Congress to extend such protection, they said.
Congress, get ready to do your job - DACA!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 5, 2017
Still, the president was conflicted until the end about how to address the plight of dreamers, waffling repeatedly in recent days about how to phase out the program.
As
late as one hour before the decision was to be announced,
administration officials privately expressed concern that Mr. Trump
might not fully grasp the details of the steps he was about to take, and
when he discovered their full impact, would change his mind, according
to a person familiar with their thinking who spoke on condition of
anonymity without authorization to comment on it.
Mr.
Trump’s action is certain to be met with condemnation from immigration
advocacy groups, who have characterized it as a coldhearted move that
would yield no benefit to the nation while endangering nearly a million
young people raised in the United States who are seeking to work and pay
taxes.
One such group, United We Dream, tweeted back at Mr. Trump Tuesday morning, urging him not to take action against DACA.
No Donald - you don't get to wash your hands. You have the power to keep DACA until Congress passes clean bill #defendDACA https://t.co/qtAInQ2cgd— United We Dream (@UNITEDWEDREAM) September 5, 2017
The
president’s move is also likely to be greeted with skepticism and
frustration by many of his most conservative supporters, who had
expected that Mr. Trump would put a permanent end to what they view as
an illegal abuse of executive authority by Mr. Obama to grant amnesty to
undocumented immigrants.
And
it is unclear whether the Republican-controlled Congress will be
willing to pass legislative protections for the young, undocumented
immigrants. Republicans have repeatedly blocked similar legislation from
passage for more than a decade.
Speaker
Paul D. Ryan recently suggested that he believes Congress should handle
the issue, saying that “this is something that Congress has to fix.”
But
more conservative members of Mr. Ryan’s caucus are certain to oppose
such moves, supported by loud, anti-immigrant hawks who dominate talk
radio and conservative news programs.
Even
in the bitter immigration debates of the past decade, children who were
illegally brought to the United States at young ages by their parents,
and who graduated from high school or sought to enter the military, have
held a sympathetic place in the conversation.
They
were branded as Dreamers for their inspiring personal stories and
regarded by members of both parties as deserving of a special status.
Opinion polls have found the public overwhelmingly supports granting
them some form of legal standing that allows them to stay and work in
the country where they were raised.
Mr.
Trump, who made his hard-line immigration stance a calling card of his
presidential campaign, savaged Mr. Obama for taking executive action in
2012 to protect Dreamers, calling his action unconstitutional and
illegal, and vowing to immediately terminate the program if he won the
White House.
But
Mr. Obama made a personal appeal to his successor about the program and
said it was one of the few initiatives he would speak out to defend
after leaving office.
And after being sworn in, Mr. Trump began to equivocate,
musing aloud about the fate of “these incredible kids,” and promising
to deal with them with “great heart” even as his core supporters
complained that he was betraying an important campaign promise.
In recent weeks, his dilemma has grown more dramatic, after 10 state attorneys general wrote
to Mr. Sessions, threatening to mount a legal challenge to DACA unless
the administration phased out the program by Sept. 5. In a recent
meeting at the White House, Mr. Sessions informed Mr. Trump he would not
defend what he considered an unconstitutional order in court, according
to people familiar with the conversation, and numerous officials at the
White House and the Department of Homeland Security made the case to
the president that his administration would look foolish if it argued in
favor of preserving it.
In June, the administration ended a similar program Mr. Obama created in 2014 to expand eligibility
for DACA and give legal status to as many as five million parents of
citizens and legal permanent residents. That order was blocked by a
legal challenge by the State of Texas, and the Supreme Court announced
last year that it had deadlocked on the case, 4 to 4.
The
attorneys general said if Mr. Trump did not take similar action to
terminate DACA, they would amend the Texas lawsuit to include it and
work to have a court overturn the program along with the other two.
As
rumors about Mr. Trump’s impending move to end DACA ran rampant in
recent days, advocacy groups and progressive activists agitated strongly
against the decision, warning that it would be particularly divisive in
the wake of the racially charged violence in Charlottesville, Va., last
month.
0 comments:
Post a Comment